1
votes
The person who asked this question at #digpres14 indicated that her institution has a general policy not to delete things. However, are there exceptions worthy of consideration?
Archived copy. This is a static snapshot of the OPF community Q&A
(
qanda.digipres.org), preserved from its Question2Answer database.
It is read-only and nothing here has been edited since capture in August 2026.
To ask new questions, use the OPF community on GitHub.
What should I consider when evaluating a request to delete materials from a digital preservation environment?
2 answers
0
votes
From #digpres14:
It could be useful to generate a written list of all exceptions that would instigate deletion of materials from the preservation environment.
For example, a virus or materials that you legally must destroy.
In other cases, it is probably acceptable and enough to simply remove the pointers to the object without having to wipe that section of the hard drive.
It could be useful to generate a written list of all exceptions that would instigate deletion of materials from the preservation environment.
For example, a virus or materials that you legally must destroy.
In other cases, it is probably acceptable and enough to simply remove the pointers to the object without having to wipe that section of the hard drive.
0
votes
Despite a policy of not deleting objects, an organisation might be confronted with a situation to consider a decision about deleting materials. A description of such a situation can be found in the following article by Tanja de Boer and Matthijs van Otegem: Moving to new digital storage: migrating and reloading collections http://conference.ifla.org/past-wlic/2012/102-boer-en.pdf Without discussing whether the right solution was chosen, the fact is that improved versions of an already preserved collection can be offered (by publishers) and this will require organisations to make a decision.