Powered by OPF
OPF Q&A Static Archive
133 questions · 234 answers · 193 comments · 172 tags · 118 contributors · archived August 2026
Archived copy. This is a static snapshot of the OPF community Q&A (qanda.digipres.org), preserved from its Question2Answer database. It is read-only and nothing here has been edited since capture in August 2026. To ask new questions, use the OPF community on GitHub.

What format questions to ask and considerations to make in acquisition of born digital architectural drawings?

0
votes

Libraries and Archives that collect and aquire in architicture and design often collect both finished architectural drawings and archives containing drafts and revisions of those drawings as well as prints and photographs. Given that drafting has become a principly digital afair, with its own set of special formats, what kinds of formats should libraries be seeking? Spesifcially, in what situations does it make sense to aquire original files from idyosyncratic production formats (DWG,DXF, etc), and in what cases does it make sense to try and get exports of computer aided design documents into other formats, like PDF?

In particular, I would be interested in what questions and considerations a curator should think through regarding 1) sustainability of formats and 2) richness of the documentation of the architectural/design record?

 

2 answers

0
votes
Functionality factors: accuracy and precision.
0
votes
You may want to consider ISO 10303, "Automation systems and integration — Product data representation and exchange", known informally as 'STEP', which stands for "Standard for the Exchange of Product model data". It's not simple (in fact, it's very complex), but it's widely supported by an array of Big-Time Players.

Also, ISO TC171 will be publishing PDF/E-2 (the second version of PDF/E, as in "Engineering") next year (2015). It will have enhanced support for digital preservation.

There's a set of metadata standards for architectural, engineering and construction drawings: ISO 82045 (Parts 1, 2, and 5) you may want to look at.

Best regards.