<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Digital Preservation Q&amp;A - Recent questions tagged algorithms</title>
<link>https://qanda.digipres.org/tag/algorithms</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>To what extent do cryptographic hash (MD5, SHA1, etc.) collisions rates matter for fixity checking?</title>
<link>https://qanda.digipres.org/13/extent-cryptographic-collisions-rates-matter-fixity-checking</link>
<description>&lt;h1 style=&quot;margin: 0px 0px 20px; line-height: 1.1; font-size: 28px; font-family: Lato, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12px;&quot;&gt;Given the probabilities of hash value collisions are MD5 hashes sufficient for ensuring file fixity? Or should SHA1 or SHA2 be used? Or, should folks be catching all three. I would be interested in both issues to consider for tamper resistance and for simply knowing if what I have is what I think I have.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://qanda.digipres.org/13/extent-cryptographic-collisions-rates-matter-fixity-checking</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>